Products
Resources
As businesses integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into their operations, Shadow AI has become a significant concern. Shadow AI refers to using AI tools and applications without formal oversight. This can lead to serious risks, including data breaches, compliance issues, operational inefficiencies and ethical dilemmas.
Managing these risks is essential for any organisation. Effective AI governance and strong security measures are vital to mitigating the potential downsides of Shadow AI.
This article will discuss the business risks associated with Shadow AI and how Zendata provides comprehensive solutions to address these challenges, ensuring that businesses can safely and effectively harness the power of AI.
Shadow AI refers to using artificial intelligence applications, tools, and systems within an organisation without formal approval or oversight by the IT or data governance teams. These unauthorised AI implementations often occur because departments or individual employees seek to solve specific problems or gain insights quickly, bypassing standard protocols and controls.
Shadow AI can manifest in various ways within a business:
Several factors contribute to the rise of Shadow AI:
Understanding Shadow AI is the first step towards recognising its risks and taking action to manage it effectively.
Several businesses, including companies like Samsung, have banned ChatGPT and other GenAI applications due to the risk of accidental (or intentional) data leakage. Back in 2023, Bloomberg reported that an internal Samsung survey found that 65% of respondents viewed GenAI as a security risk.
Shadow AI can lead to significant data security risks. When AI tools are used without proper oversight, there is a high chance of unauthorised access to sensitive data. According to a survey by LayerX, more than 6% of employees have pasted sensitive data into GenAI, directly putting their organisation at risk of data exfiltration.
This can result in data breaches, exposing the company to financial losses and reputational damage. The lack of centralised control makes it challenging to track and manage data flow, increasing the risk of data leaks.
Key issues include:
Using AI tools without formal approval can lead to non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR and CCPA. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines and legal implications.
Without a formal review process, Shadow AI can easily breach compliance protocols, exposing the company to regulatory scrutiny and financial penalties.
Specific compliance issues include:
Shadow AI can disrupt business operations and decision-making. When departments use different AI tools without coordination, it can lead to discrepancies in data and analytics outcomes. This lack of consistency can affect strategic decisions and operational efficiency.
According to the Dell Technologies survey, "44% of organisations are in early to mid-stages of GenAI deployment, often facing challenges in integrating these tools across departments". This fragmented approach can lead to operational inefficiencies and misaligned strategies.
Operational risks include:
AI models developed without oversight can embed biases, leading to unfair outcomes. This can harm the company's reputation and lead to ethical issues. Asana’s Work Smarter with AI playbook indicates that "81% of individual contributors fear that AI will compromise their human rights".
Ethical risks include bias in decision-making, lack of transparency in AI processes, and potential discrimination, all of which can damage a company's public image and trustworthiness.
Key ethical concerns include:
Our CEO, Narayana Pappu, recently told DICE that “countering shadow A.I. is about understanding data flows. This includes knowing which employees or managers are accessing corporate data and how their teams use it within LLMs.”
In research released by LayerX, source code (31%), internal business information (43%) and Personal Identifiable Information (PII) (12%) are the leading types of pasted sensitive data - which makes Shadow AI a serious risk.
If you don’t understand how your business is using its data, where it’s stored, where it’s flowing to and from and what applications have access to it, you’ve lost the battle before it’s begun.
Let’s look at the 4 key ways Zendata can help to mitigate Shadow AI risk.
AI governance involves establishing a framework to oversee an organisation's development, deployment, and use of AI tools. Without proper AI governance, Shadow AI can flourish, leading to unauthorised AI usage, inconsistent practices and potential compliance violations. Effective AI governance ensures all AI activities are aligned with company policies and regulations, reducing the risk of Shadow AI.
Zendata automates the mapping and comparison of AI governance policies with CI/CD pipelines, AI model development, and deployment processes. This ensures that all AI activities adhere to the company's governance framework. By providing a unified, secure view of AI usage, Zendata helps businesses identify and address unauthorised AI activities, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of Shadow AI.
Shadow AI can lead to significant security and privacy risks, including unauthorised access to sensitive data and data leakage and breaches. These risks arise because Shadow AI tools often bypass established security protocols, leaving data vulnerable to exposure and theft.
Zendata enhances data privacy and security by automating the identification, detection, management and protection of sensitive data across the entire IT infrastructure. This includes securing codebases, development pipelines, SDKs, endpoints and data lakes. By providing comprehensive coverage, Zendata helps businesses prevent data leakage and unauthorised data use, mitigating the security risks posed by Shadow AI.
Shadow AI often leads to non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR and CCPA, as these unauthorised tools and processes are not subjected to formal compliance checks. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines, legal consequences and damage to the organisation's reputation.
Zendata's compliance solutions include tools that highlight whether you’re processing data in the ways you say you are, along with tools that help businesses maintain accurate records of data processing activities. By integrating compliance checks into workflows, Zendata helps organisations avoid the legal and financial repercussions associated with Shadow AI.
Unsupervised AI models developed and deployed without proper oversight can embed biases, leading to unfair and unethical outcomes. These biases can damage a company's reputation and result in ethical issues, including discrimination and lack of transparency in decision-making.
Zendata provides out-of-the-box remediation and integrated risk mitigation solutions for AI model management. These features allow businesses to monitor and manage their AI models to ensure they are developed and deployed in line with governance policies. By offering tools to detect and address bias, Zendata helps organisations maintain ethical standards and transparency, reducing the ethical risks associated with Shadow AI.
Traditional Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions often fall short when addressing the issues Shadow AI introduces. These tools typically focus on data at rest and in transit within known systems.
However, Shadow AI tools frequently operate outside these monitored environments, using cloud services, third-party applications and unsanctioned tools, making it difficult for DLP solutions to detect and manage unauthorised data usage.
DLP solutions are not equipped to handle the diverse and dynamic nature of AI tools.
Most DLP solutions are reactive, focusing on identifying and responding to data breaches after they occur, rather than preventing unauthorised AI tools from being used in the first place. They also often lack integration with other security and governance tools, which is crucial for the effective management of Shadow AI.
The rise of Shadow AI poses significant risks to businesses, including data security breaches, compliance violations, operational inefficiencies, and ethical dilemmas. Without proper oversight and governance, shadow AI can lead to severe financial, legal and reputational consequences. Addressing these risks is crucial for any organisation looking to leverage AI technology effectively.
By partnering with Zendata, organisations can turn the potential risks of Shadow AI into opportunities for secure, compliant and ethical growth. This proactive approach ensures that AI becomes a strategic asset that drives growth and not a liability that hinders it.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
As businesses integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into their operations, Shadow AI has become a significant concern. Shadow AI refers to using AI tools and applications without formal oversight. This can lead to serious risks, including data breaches, compliance issues, operational inefficiencies and ethical dilemmas.
Managing these risks is essential for any organisation. Effective AI governance and strong security measures are vital to mitigating the potential downsides of Shadow AI.
This article will discuss the business risks associated with Shadow AI and how Zendata provides comprehensive solutions to address these challenges, ensuring that businesses can safely and effectively harness the power of AI.
Shadow AI refers to using artificial intelligence applications, tools, and systems within an organisation without formal approval or oversight by the IT or data governance teams. These unauthorised AI implementations often occur because departments or individual employees seek to solve specific problems or gain insights quickly, bypassing standard protocols and controls.
Shadow AI can manifest in various ways within a business:
Several factors contribute to the rise of Shadow AI:
Understanding Shadow AI is the first step towards recognising its risks and taking action to manage it effectively.
Several businesses, including companies like Samsung, have banned ChatGPT and other GenAI applications due to the risk of accidental (or intentional) data leakage. Back in 2023, Bloomberg reported that an internal Samsung survey found that 65% of respondents viewed GenAI as a security risk.
Shadow AI can lead to significant data security risks. When AI tools are used without proper oversight, there is a high chance of unauthorised access to sensitive data. According to a survey by LayerX, more than 6% of employees have pasted sensitive data into GenAI, directly putting their organisation at risk of data exfiltration.
This can result in data breaches, exposing the company to financial losses and reputational damage. The lack of centralised control makes it challenging to track and manage data flow, increasing the risk of data leaks.
Key issues include:
Using AI tools without formal approval can lead to non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR and CCPA. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines and legal implications.
Without a formal review process, Shadow AI can easily breach compliance protocols, exposing the company to regulatory scrutiny and financial penalties.
Specific compliance issues include:
Shadow AI can disrupt business operations and decision-making. When departments use different AI tools without coordination, it can lead to discrepancies in data and analytics outcomes. This lack of consistency can affect strategic decisions and operational efficiency.
According to the Dell Technologies survey, "44% of organisations are in early to mid-stages of GenAI deployment, often facing challenges in integrating these tools across departments". This fragmented approach can lead to operational inefficiencies and misaligned strategies.
Operational risks include:
AI models developed without oversight can embed biases, leading to unfair outcomes. This can harm the company's reputation and lead to ethical issues. Asana’s Work Smarter with AI playbook indicates that "81% of individual contributors fear that AI will compromise their human rights".
Ethical risks include bias in decision-making, lack of transparency in AI processes, and potential discrimination, all of which can damage a company's public image and trustworthiness.
Key ethical concerns include:
Our CEO, Narayana Pappu, recently told DICE that “countering shadow A.I. is about understanding data flows. This includes knowing which employees or managers are accessing corporate data and how their teams use it within LLMs.”
In research released by LayerX, source code (31%), internal business information (43%) and Personal Identifiable Information (PII) (12%) are the leading types of pasted sensitive data - which makes Shadow AI a serious risk.
If you don’t understand how your business is using its data, where it’s stored, where it’s flowing to and from and what applications have access to it, you’ve lost the battle before it’s begun.
Let’s look at the 4 key ways Zendata can help to mitigate Shadow AI risk.
AI governance involves establishing a framework to oversee an organisation's development, deployment, and use of AI tools. Without proper AI governance, Shadow AI can flourish, leading to unauthorised AI usage, inconsistent practices and potential compliance violations. Effective AI governance ensures all AI activities are aligned with company policies and regulations, reducing the risk of Shadow AI.
Zendata automates the mapping and comparison of AI governance policies with CI/CD pipelines, AI model development, and deployment processes. This ensures that all AI activities adhere to the company's governance framework. By providing a unified, secure view of AI usage, Zendata helps businesses identify and address unauthorised AI activities, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of Shadow AI.
Shadow AI can lead to significant security and privacy risks, including unauthorised access to sensitive data and data leakage and breaches. These risks arise because Shadow AI tools often bypass established security protocols, leaving data vulnerable to exposure and theft.
Zendata enhances data privacy and security by automating the identification, detection, management and protection of sensitive data across the entire IT infrastructure. This includes securing codebases, development pipelines, SDKs, endpoints and data lakes. By providing comprehensive coverage, Zendata helps businesses prevent data leakage and unauthorised data use, mitigating the security risks posed by Shadow AI.
Shadow AI often leads to non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR and CCPA, as these unauthorised tools and processes are not subjected to formal compliance checks. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines, legal consequences and damage to the organisation's reputation.
Zendata's compliance solutions include tools that highlight whether you’re processing data in the ways you say you are, along with tools that help businesses maintain accurate records of data processing activities. By integrating compliance checks into workflows, Zendata helps organisations avoid the legal and financial repercussions associated with Shadow AI.
Unsupervised AI models developed and deployed without proper oversight can embed biases, leading to unfair and unethical outcomes. These biases can damage a company's reputation and result in ethical issues, including discrimination and lack of transparency in decision-making.
Zendata provides out-of-the-box remediation and integrated risk mitigation solutions for AI model management. These features allow businesses to monitor and manage their AI models to ensure they are developed and deployed in line with governance policies. By offering tools to detect and address bias, Zendata helps organisations maintain ethical standards and transparency, reducing the ethical risks associated with Shadow AI.
Traditional Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions often fall short when addressing the issues Shadow AI introduces. These tools typically focus on data at rest and in transit within known systems.
However, Shadow AI tools frequently operate outside these monitored environments, using cloud services, third-party applications and unsanctioned tools, making it difficult for DLP solutions to detect and manage unauthorised data usage.
DLP solutions are not equipped to handle the diverse and dynamic nature of AI tools.
Most DLP solutions are reactive, focusing on identifying and responding to data breaches after they occur, rather than preventing unauthorised AI tools from being used in the first place. They also often lack integration with other security and governance tools, which is crucial for the effective management of Shadow AI.
The rise of Shadow AI poses significant risks to businesses, including data security breaches, compliance violations, operational inefficiencies, and ethical dilemmas. Without proper oversight and governance, shadow AI can lead to severe financial, legal and reputational consequences. Addressing these risks is crucial for any organisation looking to leverage AI technology effectively.
By partnering with Zendata, organisations can turn the potential risks of Shadow AI into opportunities for secure, compliant and ethical growth. This proactive approach ensures that AI becomes a strategic asset that drives growth and not a liability that hinders it.
.jpg)
